Participants review of training

From Harambee Wiki

Jump to: navigation, search

What I liked

  • Learned something valuable and looking forward to future
  • Liked different ideas and techniques in stories
  • Able to express messages big time with digital stories
  • Within a very short time you can get an idea, access and share knowledge
  • Training schedule – within 24 hours we had products and new skills
  • Training atmosphere/environment was conducive to learning
  • Ongoing translation for the Francophone participants
  • Discovered something new on my computer (thought i knew it all)
  • Discovered new, easy to use tools
  • Small group which created a kind of intimacy
  • Training style made it easy for everyone to do a digital story
  • Top quality outputs produced quickly and safely
  • Short time requested to make a video
  • Riff took us where he wanted to go, but in a nice way (this was termed "facipulation")
  • Viewing movies from previous workshops at the beginning which was encouraging
  • Trainers were not tough
  • Training was participatory
  • Emphasis on “I” (telling the story from a personal perspective)
  • Time constraint; it forced us to move quickly and solve problems
  • Everything
  • Availability of organizing committee
  • Although the trainers could not communicate in French, the francophones produced excellent stories
  • Initially confused, then excited to produce something and have a very good communication/knowledge sharing tool
  • New skills can be shared with others
  • Training approach was very tactical. Explanations were very short and most time allocated to hands-on work and coaching
  • Liked simplicity and easy going facilitation
  • People had fun 
  • Seeing everyone’s movies
  • Everyone helped each other
  • People were willing to experiment
  • Able to finish on time
  • Great to see motivation and commitment


What I did not like

  • Moviemaker was frustrating (hanging, reboot, e.t.c)
  • Poor location of facilities (log to far away)
  • Time so short
  • Pity that sound quality was not so good in some cases
  • Not enough info about image quality
  • Did not use storyboard form
  • No opportunity to talk/think about political choices we are making as we build stories
  • Didn’t work together online in advance
  • Could not point to flickr for some photos
  • The language support for Francophones was not planned for from the start e.g if Francois had not been here, Victorine would not have done anything. [Coordination Committee note: There were 4 bi-lingual participants]


What i would do differently the next time

  • Pay more attention to ensure sound quality
  • Increase attention to picture quality i.e provide guidelines on appropriate picture size, resolution etc
  • Raise copyright issues at the beginning so peoples can chose content accordingly
  • Emphasize need to frequently save work
  • Possibly provide sources of copyright-free content
  • Not record directly into Windows Movie Maker
  • Prepare more online (pre-workshop briefings)
Personal tools